Welcome to Laurie Furem - North Metro Atlanta - Lake Lanier Sign in | Help
2007 Purchase and Sale Agreement affects GA Home Buyers in financing contingency

The 2007 GAR Purchase and Sale Agreement can be confusing unless you read, re-read and then ask a real estate professional for advice - especially in terms of the financing contingency.  We need to be careful in the time period allowed to satisfy the contingency.  If a short time period is involved, make sure that the contract contains a separate special stipulation making the Buyer's obligation to close contingent on the appraisal.

Case in point:  Buyer has 7 days to meet the financing contingency as per the Purchase and Sale Agreement,  Buyer is financially qualified for a mortgage for the sales price of the home.  The day after the financing contingency has "been met," Buyer finds out that the property appraises about $30K under the sales price.  Buyer notifies Seller (through their respective agents) of the discrepancy.  Seller responds that the financing contingency period has come and gone.  What does this mean to the Buyer with no special stipulation in place?

 It means, the Buyer can either make up the difference between the appraisal price and sales price out of pocket; OR, forfeits his/her earnest money.by walking away. 

This scenario becomes extremely relevant for those who are unrepresented Buyers.  Please do yourselves a favor and work with a professional REALTOR(r)!

Published Friday, March 16, 2007 1:01 PM by Laurie Furem

Comment Notification

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

Comments

# re: 2007 Purchase and Sale Agreement affects GA Home Buyers in financing contingency @ Friday, March 30, 2007 11:36 AM

Laurie - We are going through this process right now, and have $7500 of earnest money on the table.  The 10-day contingency period has passed, and our property appraised for $50,000 less than the purchase price of $317,000.  Our agent did not have the foresight to include an appraisal contingency on our behalf. The sellers provided us an appraisal from June 2006 that stated the property was worth $305,000.  We feel that this is a case of fraud and pricing gouging at this point on their end, since they have no justification for their sales price. If they are unwilling to renegotiate the purchase agreement, and refuse to return our earnest money, what legal action can we take against them to prove that they were fraudently pricing their property?  

Elizabeth Eagan

Leave a Comment

(required) 
required 
(required)